In a surprising twist, Zaria, known for her role alongside Chandler Kinney in 'Pretty Little Liars', expresses her conviction that she should have secured the Dancing with the Stars title. Her candid comments spark debates about talent, competition, and the unpredictability of reality TV.
In a captivating turn of events, Zaria, the breakout star of *Pretty Little Liars*, has made waves by asserting that she deserved to win the coveted crown on *Dancing with the Stars* (DWTS) over her fellow contestant, Chandler Kinney. Her bold claim has ignited a fresh wave of debates surrounding the unpredictability of reality TV competitions, the factors that contribute to victory, and the blurred lines between public perception and raw talent. In this article, we dive deep into Zaria’s comments, explore the dynamics of *DWTS*, and consider how these elements shape reality TV success.
*Dancing with the Stars* has become a cornerstone of reality television, bringing together a mixture of celebrities, professional dancers, and captivating performances. The show’s format is unique in that it combines public voting with expert judges’ scores, creating an unpredictable environment that often leaves audiences wondering: what truly determines the winner? Is it raw talent, fan popularity, or the ability to generate buzz?
For Zaria, the competition was fierce. As a rising actress with a strong fan base, her participation in *DWTS* attracted significant attention. However, the contest ultimately ended with Chandler Kinney being crowned the winner. Zaria, despite delivering impressive performances throughout the season, was not awarded the top prize. This has led her to publicly state that she believes her journey on the show should have resulted in a different outcome.
During a recent interview, Zaria didn’t hold back when discussing her thoughts on the final results of *DWTS*. “I felt like I gave it my all every week, and my performances were a reflection of that effort. I truly believe that I deserved the crown over Chandler,” Zaria remarked. Her statement has raised eyebrows, especially considering the competitive nature of *DWTS* and the unpredictable nature of the public voting system. Zaria’s comments suggest she feels her technical prowess and consistent performances weren’t given enough weight compared to other factors such as audience sentiment or star power.
The mixed scoring system of *DWTS*—which combines judges’ scores with audience votes—has always been a point of contention. While the judges are professionals in the dance world, their scores often carry less weight compared to the public’s opinion. This reliance on fan votes can skew the results, as audience members may vote based on personal biases, popularity, or even celebrity status, rather than technical skill or improvement.
Zaria, who is well-known for her role on *Pretty Little Liars*, certainly had an established fan base. However, her assertion that she deserved the win challenges the notion that fan support should play such a prominent role. This brings into question whether reality TV competitions should place more emphasis on the objective aspects of a contestant’s performance rather than public sentiment.
Chandler Kinney’s win in *DWTS* was celebrated by many of her fans, and her performances throughout the season were certainly noteworthy. Known for her dance ability and poise, Chandler impressed both the judges and the public. While she brought strong technical skills to the dance floor, it is important to consider other factors that might have contributed to her success.
Despite Zaria’s own impressive performances, Chandler’s combination of dance talent, stage presence, and fan support ultimately earned her the title. But Zaria’s comments invite a deeper reflection on the balance between subjective judging and public opinion in determining who takes home the DWTS trophy.
At the heart of Zaria’s claims lies a broader conversation about reality TV competitions: how do we define the “winner”? Is it the person who is technically the best performer, or the one who resonates most with the audience? *Dancing with the Stars*, like many reality shows, often finds itself in the middle of this debate. While talent plays a crucial role in a contestant’s success, the public’s influence can sometimes lead to outcomes that might not reflect pure skill.
This intersection of talent and popularity is not unique to *DWTS*—it extends to a range of reality TV competitions, from *American Idol* to *The Voice*. In these formats, it is common for fan voting to elevate a contestant’s position despite challenges in their technical abilities. The question remains: should popularity and public support play such a decisive role in determining the outcome of a skill-based competition?
In Zaria’s case, her technical proficiency on the dance floor was consistently strong. However, it is possible that her emotional connection with the audience, or perhaps her star power, didn’t quite reach the same level of intensity as some of her competitors. Her comments, therefore, reflect a frustration with the very system that has allowed *DWTS* to thrive, questioning whether the structure of such competitions ultimately rewards the right candidates.
Zaria’s bold claim may not only change the way *DWTS* fans view the show but could also inspire a larger conversation about fairness and transparency in reality TV competitions. In an age where public voting is increasingly integrated into these shows, it is worth asking whether the dynamic is ultimately serving the integrity of the competition or simply reinforcing the power of popular personalities.
Furthermore, Zaria’s comments could spark discussions about the pressure that contestants face in these environments. As much as *DWTS* is about showcasing dance talent, it also places a heavy emphasis on public personas, potentially overshadowing the true spirit of artistic competition. This challenge is not unique to *DWTS*, but rather a reflection of the broader landscape of reality TV, where the audience’s influence often outpaces the objective skill assessment of the judges.
Zaria’s claim that she deserved the DWTS crown challenges the prevailing model of reality TV competitions that prioritize fan votes as much as, or more than, technical expertise. While Chandler Kinney’s victory was well-earned, Zaria’s comments highlight a growing conversation about the intersection of fame, talent, and public perception in the world of reality television.
As audiences continue to shape the outcomes of such competitions, it is important to strike a balance between recognizing raw talent and understanding the influence of fan loyalty and popularity. *Dancing with the Stars* continues to be a captivating platform for showcasing celebrity talent, but Zaria’s bold statement serves as a reminder that the competition is not always as straightforward as it seems.
For more insights into the world of reality TV and the balance between talent and popularity, check out our detailed article on EW’s DWTS coverage.
See more CNET Live
Zoë Kravitz and Harry Styles' romantic stroll in Rome captivates fans and ignites buzz in…
Discover the captivating crossword challenge from August 2025 and test your skills today!
Reggie Carroll, beloved comedian, was tragically shot dead at 52 in Mississippi; a suspect is…
Snoop Dogg challenges LGBTQ+ representation in children's cinema, igniting a vital discussion on inclusivity and…
Discover the winning numbers of the Mexico Lottery for August 2025.
Seth Rogen discusses the romance fixation in 'Platonic,' linking it to 'Friends' legacy.