Unveiling the Flaws: What ‘Wicked’ Reveals About Modern Theatre

Since its Broadway debut in 2003, *Wicked* has become one of the most beloved musicals in contemporary theatre. Adapted from Gregory Maguire’s novel, it reimagines the classic *Wizard of Oz* story, providing a backstory for the Wicked Witch of the West and her complex relationship with Glinda, the Good Witch. While *Wicked* has consistently captivated audiences worldwide with its sweeping melodies, dynamic performances, and striking visual effects, its success also brings attention to some of the inherent flaws in modern theatre. These issues raise important questions about the industry’s artistic direction, commercialization, and the balance between entertainment and innovation.

The Enormous Success of *Wicked*

*Wicked*’s widespread success can be attributed to a variety of factors, from its catchy score, which includes iconic songs like “Defying Gravity,” to its modern twist on a familiar narrative. It has played to millions of theatergoers worldwide, earning over $1.3 billion on Broadway alone, making it one of the highest-grossing Broadway shows in history. The musical’s universal themes of friendship, identity, and the fight for justice resonate deeply with audiences, drawing a diverse crowd that includes families, young adults, and long-time theatre aficionados alike.

But *Wicked* is more than just a commercial powerhouse—it represents a shift in the musical theatre landscape. It epitomizes the modern blockbuster musical: visually stunning, emotionally charged, and mass-appealing. Its success has raised the bar for what a Broadway show should achieve, setting high expectations for production values, star power, and audience engagement.

The Commercialization of Theatre: A Double-Edged Sword

While *Wicked* has undeniably set a high standard in terms of its production value, it has also contributed to the ongoing trend of commercialization in modern theatre. This shift has brought a number of challenges to the art form, particularly in terms of the quality and diversity of productions being brought to stage. As Broadway and West End theatres become more reliant on large-scale, commercial productions, some smaller, experimental shows face difficulties in securing funding, space, and attention.

Audience Expectations and Market Forces

The success of *Wicked* and similar blockbuster productions like *The Lion King*, *Hamilton*, and *Harry Potter and the Cursed Child* has led to an overwhelming preference for spectacles that promise high returns on investment. Producers increasingly prioritize shows with broad mass appeal over those that challenge audiences or push the boundaries of theatrical innovation. This trend is reflective of a wider cultural shift toward spectacle-driven entertainment that prioritizes visual effects, star power, and recognizability over substance.

• High production costs and reliance on long-running performances place a premium on audience familiarity and commercial viability.
• The dominance of blockbuster musicals has limited opportunities for smaller, avant-garde, or more experimental productions.
• Corporate sponsorship and commercial endorsements influence the types of shows that are given prominence, pushing aside niche or politically controversial works.

These market forces have led to a certain predictability in the theatre world, where the focus on profitability sometimes comes at the expense of artistic exploration. Newer, innovative works often struggle to compete with the guaranteed financial success of well-established productions like *Wicked*.

The Struggle of Smaller Productions in a Commercialized Landscape

As the dominance of large-scale musicals like *Wicked* has grown, so has the difficulty faced by smaller, more intimate productions. In the past, Broadway was home to a variety of plays and musicals that experimented with storytelling and format. However, these types of productions have increasingly been pushed out in favor of crowd-pleasing spectacles. Today, even off-Broadway shows that once thrived in more intimate settings face financial and logistical difficulties, unable to compete with the expensive nature of big-budget productions.

Consider the case of shows like *Be More Chill* or *The Prom*, which had strong fan followings but struggled to sustain their commercial viability. While these productions garnered significant praise for their storytelling and character development, they were unable to achieve the same financial success as *Wicked* due to the larger market forces at play.

Why Do Smaller Productions Struggle?

• High Costs: The cost of production for Broadway shows has skyrocketed, making it difficult for smaller productions to afford the necessary marketing, sets, and actors required to make an impact.
• Media Attention: Major media outlets often focus on large, established productions, giving little coverage to new or experimental shows.
• Lack of Investment: Investors tend to prefer safe bets, meaning that groundbreaking or niche works often struggle to attract financial backers.

This imbalance not only affects the diversity of shows on stage but also impacts the theatre community’s ability to experiment and grow. A theatre industry dominated by commercial success tends to prioritize familiar narratives, familiar aesthetics, and recognizable stars over fresh ideas and voices.

Artistic Integrity vs. Commercial Pressure: Finding a Balance

While commercial success has made *Wicked* an undeniable force in modern theatre, it has also led to a growing concern over the future of artistic integrity. As productions become more focused on profit, it raises the question: what is lost in the pursuit of commercial appeal? In the case of *Wicked*, some critics argue that the musical’s broad popularity and wide-reaching appeal dilute its potential for deeper, more nuanced storytelling.

Some argue that theatre, as an art form, should resist becoming overly commercialized. Instead, it should strive to challenge audiences and provide more than just a fun night out. This perspective calls for a return to the roots of theatre—where the emphasis is on storytelling, character development, and emotional connection, rather than the spectacle and the bottom line.

Can Commercial Success and Artistic Innovation Coexist?

While *Wicked* may be a symbol of commercial success, it does not necessarily mean that artistry is compromised. In fact, many argue that the best of modern theatre can strike a balance between commercial success and artistic innovation. Shows like *Hamilton*, which blend contemporary themes with historical narratives, have managed to capture both the public’s imagination and critical acclaim. These productions demonstrate that innovation and commercial appeal can coexist, though they require careful curation, investment, and vision from both the creative and business sides of theatre.

Ultimately, theatre’s future may depend on its ability to strike a balance between artistry and commercialism. A diversified theatre landscape—one where both large-scale blockbusters and smaller, experimental works can thrive—could potentially offer audiences the best of both worlds.

Conclusion: A Call for Diverse Theatre Experiences

*Wicked* has redefined the Broadway experience, solidifying its place as a landmark production. Its success, however, underscores a broader issue within the theatre world: the tension between commercialism and artistic integrity. While larger-than-life musicals like *Wicked* continue to capture the public’s imagination, it is vital for the industry to support diverse types of performances that push creative boundaries and challenge audiences.

As we move forward, it is essential for the theatre community—artists, producers, and audiences alike—to reflect on the evolving nature of the art form. Balancing spectacle with innovation, supporting smaller productions, and encouraging diverse voices will ensure that theatre remains a dynamic, vibrant, and relevant space for future generations.

For more insights into the changing dynamics of theatre, visit Playbill.

If you’re interested in exploring the broader impacts of commercialization in art, read more about it in this article on Artsy.

See more CNET Live