Margaret Atwood’s *The Handmaid’s Tale* has resonated with readers since its release in 1985, and its recent adaptation by Hulu has sparked widespread discussion. With its haunting portrayal of a dystopian world where women’s rights are stripped away, the novel remains an essential work of feminist literature. However, the television series, which premiered in 2017, takes creative liberties that not only differentiate it from the original text but also redefine key themes, characters, and the overall narrative. In this article, we explore the primary differences between the novel and the TV series adaptation, examining how these changes influence the storytelling and thematic underpinnings of *The Handmaid’s Tale*, while also considering the broader implications of such adaptations in modern media.
Key Themes: Fidelity to the Original Narrative
One of the central debates surrounding any adaptation is the degree to which it remains faithful to the source material. Hulu’s *The Handmaid’s Tale* maintains the essence of Atwood’s dystopian society, Gilead, but diverges significantly in terms of themes and narrative structure. While the novel primarily focuses on the experiences of its protagonist, Offred, and the oppressive world she navigates, the series extends the scope to include more characters and explores broader political contexts.
Expanding the Role of Offred
In Atwood’s novel, Offred’s story is deeply introspective, characterized by her internal monologues and reflections on her past life and the brutality of Gilead. The series, however, introduces a more dynamic portrayal of her character, allowing viewers to witness her physical resistance to the regime. This shift makes Offred less passive and more proactive than in the novel, where she is often constrained by the limitations imposed upon her by the totalitarian society. The show emphasizes her efforts to fight back, including her illicit relationships with characters like Nick and her involvement in resistance movements like Mayday.
The Role of Male Characters
In both the novel and the series, male characters like Commander Waterford play a significant role in Offred’s life. However, the TV series expands their roles considerably. For example, the character of Nick (who is a secondary figure in the novel) is given a much larger presence, with a romantic subplot developed over multiple seasons. This expansion of male characters, while adding complexity to their relationships with the female protagonists, can be seen as an attempt by the showrunners to present Gilead’s patriarchal structure in more nuanced ways.
New Characters and Subplots: Diverging from the Novel
The Hulu adaptation also introduces new characters and subplots not present in Atwood’s book. These additions not only help to flesh out the world of Gilead but also provide new perspectives on the societal horrors depicted in the story.
The Introduction of the Waterfords’ Backstory
While the novel briefly touches on the relationship between the Waterfords, the show delves deeper into their history and the complexities of their marriage. This subplot humanizes the characters to some extent, showing that the oppression in Gilead affects both men and women in complex ways. The Waterfords are portrayed as complicit in the system, but their motivations are explored in greater detail, particularly through flashbacks that reveal their initial reluctance to embrace Gilead’s ideologies.
Ofglen and the Expansion of the Resistance
The series also expands the character of Ofglen, who in the novel is a fleeting presence in Offred’s life. In the TV series, Ofglen becomes an integral part of the narrative, representing the underground resistance movement within Gilead. This subplot not only serves as a counterpoint to the subjugation of women but also injects a sense of hope into the narrative. Ofglen’s journey and her eventual fate are pivotal moments in the series, providing a sense of momentum that is less pronounced in the novel.
Political and Social Commentary: The Relevance of the Adaptation
Atwood’s *The Handmaid’s Tale* has always been seen as a cautionary tale about the dangers of religious extremism and the erosion of women’s rights. The TV series amplifies these themes, making them more explicitly relevant to contemporary issues. The adaptation, in particular, responds to the political climate in which it was produced, with increasing debates about women’s reproductive rights and the rise of authoritarian leaders globally.
The Portrayal of Reproductive Rights
While the novel focuses on the totalitarian control of women’s bodies in a theoretical future, the TV series reflects more urgent concerns about reproductive rights in the modern world. The portrayal of women as mere vessels for childbirth resonates with current discussions about abortion laws, birth control access, and the intersection of religion and politics. In this sense, the series takes Atwood’s original premise and gives it a sharper, more immediate resonance, as it addresses issues that have become focal points in global politics.
Gender Politics and Modern Feminism
The TV series also engages with contemporary feminist discourse more directly than the novel. While Atwood’s original text is a more subtle critique of patriarchy, the series underscores the power dynamics between men and women with greater emphasis. The show positions its characters in a modern context, aligning its plot with feminist movements that are fighting for women’s rights, gender equality, and the protection of bodily autonomy. The representation of women in various forms of resistance – from passive to active defiance – serves as an empowering narrative for today’s audience.
Visual Storytelling: A Shift in Medium
As a visual medium, television allows for a different kind of storytelling than the written word. The *Handmaid’s Tale* series, with its striking cinematography and haunting visual imagery, conveys a sense of desolation and control that Atwood’s novel only hints at. The show’s use of color, particularly the red uniforms of the Handmaids, serves as a potent visual metaphor for oppression. Meanwhile, the series’s use of the environment—such as the desolate landscapes of Gilead—helps to create an atmosphere that feels more immediate and visceral.
Symbolism Through Cinematography
The frequent use of close-ups on the faces of the characters, especially Offred, amplifies the emotional and psychological tension. The barren, almost sterile settings of Gilead enhance the sense of a world devoid of hope and humanity. The haunting soundtrack and slow pacing further intensify the feelings of dread and claustrophobia that permeate the story. These visual elements give the series a unique identity, which both complements and contrasts with the book’s more introspective and cerebral narrative.
The Ending: Diverging Futures
One of the most significant differences between the novel and the series is how they handle the ending. *The Handmaid’s Tale* novel concludes ambiguously, with Offred being taken away by the authorities, her fate left uncertain. This open-ended conclusion allows readers to draw their own conclusions about the future of Gilead and the fate of its inhabitants. The Hulu series, however, takes a different approach by extending the story far beyond the novel’s conclusion. This has allowed the creators to explore new themes, such as the potential for Gilead’s downfall and the possibility of a future revolution, making the story more expansive than Atwood’s original vision.
While the series’ continued exploration of Gilead provides a sense of closure and agency for its characters, it also deviates from the book’s central theme of powerlessness. By offering more optimistic portrayals of resistance and hope, the show shifts the tone from the novel’s original fatalism to something more open-ended, though not without its own set of risks in terms of narrative consistency.
Conclusion: The Art of Adaptation
Hulu’s *The Handmaid’s Tale* adaptation presents an intricate balance between honoring the spirit of Margaret Atwood’s original novel and offering new interpretations for a modern audience. The differences in themes, character development, and plot trajectories reveal the complexities involved in adapting a work of literature into a television series. The show’s broader focus on political relevance, visual storytelling, and the expansion of characters reflects both the potential and challenges of translating a powerful book into a medium that requires new methods of engagement.
As with all adaptations, the relationship between the book and its screen version is inherently fraught with both creative liberties and necessary constraints. Whether the series is considered an improvement or a departure from the novel depends on one’s perspective on fidelity in adaptations. What is clear, however, is that Hulu’s *The Handmaid’s Tale* serves as a powerful continuation of Atwood’s dystopian world—one that reflects our current struggles while inviting us to imagine both the possibilities and dangers of a society governed by patriarchal control.
See more CNET Live